Well, I went and did it. Despite it being my most important rule … I’ve let myself fall behind. There are warring parts of me that want to blame anyone but me, and accept all the blame. But I honestly think that TM254 is just terrible enough to bear more than some of the responsibility. I get so angry with how poorly written it is, how often it contradicts itself, and, of course, how wrong it is, that I have to wander away from it for a bit or risk stress levels that are way too high.
I fell several weeks behind. As of right now, I’m still technically six days behind, but that’s sufficient for me to start work on the TMA that’s due in a week. I’ve got most of my notes for the TMA complete, so it’s mostly writing it up. That should take me between two and four nights. The worst part isn’t how it’s impacting TM254, but that my other module is suffering while I’ve tried to catch up.
Just a quick example of how poorly thought out the module is: The first TMA is due in week 8. It evaluates material (or at least your reactions to being assessed on material) from week 9.
Here’s another example: An alleged 7 hour block part is broken down into 7 sections. These sections are 10 minutes, 35 minutes, 5 hours and 20 minutes, 15 minutes, 25 minutes, 5 minutes, and 10 minutes. Am I the only one who thinks that if these are the way the sections break down, perhaps there was a much more logical way to break the sections down? And this occurs in most of the block parts. The beehive structure does not lend itself well to study sessions. And it’s less of a beehive and more of a Frisbee, anyway.
(I will interject a defence of the module here, in that at least they warn you ahead of time that the block part is unbalanced. It doesn’t make it any more logically written, however.)
I should be able to get both the TMA done and the six days’ work I’m behind this next week, then it’s time to concentrate on the TMA I have due in my other module. (That one at least has actual answers, and not “Guess what I’m thinking” questions like, “What does this imply?” Knock it off. Your assumptions are not assessable facts. And from the way everything else has been written, the TMA rubric will require that your answer match the question’s author’s, regardless of how well defended, cited, referenced, reasoned, and articulated your answer is.)
I’m shooting for about 70 marks on this TMA, even though the lowest I’ve ever gotten on anything with the OU is 90. I’m going to take a result of Pass 2 on this module and attempt to make up for it in future years.