After catching up a bit in TM129 the other week, I figured I was done with everything in the Robotics block except for TMA01, so I might as well get that out of the way. As it’s due in mid-December, and it’s such a fast module to study, I figured that if I got the TMA out of the way, I could put TM129 on the back burner until January and just concentrate on MST124’s maths.
TM129’s TMA01 is quite uneven. Question 1 mostly tests if you were paying attention during the block, and could mostly be answered using the search function from the module planner. It also asks for opinions, but it’d be difficult to get your own opinion wrong, so …
Question 2 is weird. Parts A and C check your understanding of concepts. Part B tests maths skills. And maths skills are not a part of the Learning Objectives for TM129. Yet part B still took two full pages to answer.
Question 3 is just programming the virtual robot. It’s completely harmless, but fun. I stretched my wings a bit and included abstraction techniques, self-commenting code methods, and so forth, none of which is part of the module. If there’s a possibility of getting points docked for talking too much, I’ll be guilty here, but there are no word count limits for any section but question 4.
Speaking of question 4, it’s a report. They ask for a lot of things, starting with research, and want you to fit it all into 400 words. The word limit is a bit of a tall order, but it sets the expectations for scope. One problem is that the specification asks for something contrary to the supplied context of the question. I included it, but didn’t state that it was in reference to the specification request, so I may lose one or two points here. (I think my tutor’s pretty good, though, so I don’t really think I will.)
Question 5 is just attaching the ePortfolio for the robotics block. Which was awesome and fun to do. I never imagined I’d love the ePortfolio, but I totally do. Just do it as it comes, and not when the TMA is due, though. Some students are already starting to struggle back-filling ePortfolio activities.
My MST124 TMA01 came back today, literally the last day it could. I feel bad for my tutor, as she’s obviously extremely busy. There were no comments on any of my work at all, and even though I had made (quite a few) errors on the TMA (though all the answers were correct), I was still given the full 100 marks. I think it may have been a bit of a last minute rush job, and I’ll probably get that with each of the TMAs in this module.
I suppose that means my style is okay. I’m just under halfway through TMA02, so it’s nice that I won’t have to retype everything in a different style.
I’ve moved on from Unit 3 (Functions and Logarithms) to Unit 4 (Trigonometry), and it’s a breath of fresh air. I love functions and logarithms, and think they’re the coolest parts I’ve encountered in maths. But the MST124 materials for Unit 3 were abysmal. Nearly every student who didn’t already understand the subject matter abandoned the materials for Khan Academy or any other internet site.
Anyway, I’ve got quite a few weeks just to concentrate on maths, so I’m hoping to make quite a bit of headway getting to the calculus stuff. Which is what we’re all dreading.
2018/3/9 Edit: I just realised I never posted my results for TM129 TMA01. I received a 98 on it. The missing points were for disagreeing with a point on the exclusivity of statistical and symbolic data, and a misunderstanding on which parts of my explanation I agreed and disagreed with. The comments were very helpful in identifying avenues for deeper learning, but didn’t provide much insight to what is being looked for in assignments. So it’s a mixed bag.
Congrats on the 100 for TMA01. Just wondering if your Maxima diagram had the x-axis shifted to the top of the diagram ? I lost 1 mark (2%) because I left the x-axis in the centre, which I feel was a bit harsh, so was curious if all tutors follow the same marking scheme.
I left my x-axis in the centre, but shifted the y-axis to the left by two units. I did, however, specify the y-axis range and zoom in, so while it happened to be centred, it’s shown to be a deliberate choice. (The TMA question specified that it was a requirement to set the y-axis range, so I set it without giving much thought to what was appropriate, honestly.) So I don’t know if that would have been marked the same by your tutor. As I said, it was a major rush-job by my tutor.